![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| New! FREE CARD COUNTING PRACTICE SOFTWARE
Free Card Counting Practice Software (By JP): Download FREE BLACKJACK SIMULATION SOFTWARE Release of Version 6, January 11, 2007 Upgrade of Blackjack PowerSim Programmable Simulation Software Download Version 6, January 11, 2007 Upgrade of Blackjack PowerSim & Instructions Free |
Download Free Blackjack Strategy Index Generator: Sam Case's Strategy Index Generator Software |
| forums | Blackjack Main |
| You are not logged in Login Register | |
messages
post
search
read all messages in forum
|
|
|
Subject : Gibberish can be (somehow, sometimes) coherent posted by Parpaluck on Oct-09-2008 03:48pm |
Quote: [empty string…the incapable author claims to be a…lawyer…the same kind of obsessive thinking as his illusion of being a card counter and poker player]
You judge the idiot by the laziness of his mind. A message has a title alright. But sanity requires it has a body consisting of at least one sentence. The sentence must be coherent. The title must be explained by developing the theme. Two or more sentences should always form the body of the message.
For title without a body is like a lawyer without a single client. How about them cowboys?
At worst, a title can be incoherent:
“incoherent jibberish is redundant you cute thing”
“incoherent” can be slightly improved by making it “Incoherent” as it begins a sentence.
Now, my best guess is that “jibberish” must be derived from something like the expression “jib the bush”(?)
As of gibberish — yes, gibberish can have some coherence. Think of them sermons. They might have some coherence — like the sermons of card counting gurus, right in this “church”. Still, in ultimate analysis, all sermons are gibberish. Hence the saying: “Card-counting is coherent gibberish”.
But your post, Maddawg, represents the lowest form of incoherent and cowardice gibberish! You thought you’d intimidate me? Huh, little puppy?
Ion Saliu, Coherently At-Large |
| read all messages in thread | reply | messages |