WRX:

You affirm in your profile that you are a dabbler and dilettante. QED: You are incapable of assembling two or more sentences in a coherent argument. How could you possibly comprehend that "Probability theory is the science of streaks"? Need say more? Such as N = log(1 – DC) / log(1 –p)?

You are frightened that such formula and other math formulae would burn the inside of your skull. You shouldn’t be scared. I keep in mind even idiots such as you when I present formulae and theories. You can start the therapy with the easiest of probability events: Coin tossing. Trust me, after a while, even you will become aware of streaks. It’s all about streaks — and each streak has an undeniable formula.

Baddog:

Your “post” is a striking example of delirious speech. You have a better chance to make money by selling your delirious writing to psychoanalysts — than as a card counter. Or a poker player (sic!)

Your delirious speech, as a reply to a post of mine, reveals a troubled ego. It is cowardice to make references to people with power (such as judges). It reveals that you can’t live without resorting to intimidation. Worse, you believe that that type of intimidation really works! The best-case scenario for you, in this case: You were drunk when you put down that incoherent gibberish.

A word to the unassuming. The casinos run this “forum”. They sponsor anything that can influence people to move in droves to the casinos — including this ‘card counting frenzy’. None of those “authors” of card counting systems is, actually, a blackjack player. If they are not casino moles (most are, like John “Jackal” Patrick), then they only make money by selling those systems. I have challenged gambling authors, including card counters, since the year of grace 2000. No response! Them “authors” know that card counting doesn’t work! Multi-deck, multi-player, penetration games? No way! In a humiliating admission to John Scarne, Ed Thorp revealed that he, the father of card counting, never really gambled (page 348 of ‘Scarne’s New Complete Guide to Gambling’). It was still the era of one-deck, one-player, no-penetration blackjack!

Has anyone seen a formula that proves the advantage of card counting?  I mean, a mathematical formula, not maddoging with numbers and incoherent, delirious words. Someone here just suggested to me to write that blackjack book based entirely on math and logic. I do have also the software foundation. I had to postpone my project because today’s computers are not up to the task when it comes to generating exponents. Do you know what exponents, permutations, arrangements and combinations are? I am asking you, Baddogs, Mad-dogs, Dabblers, Dilettantes, CC Scammers & Addicts?

Parpaluck,

No link required