Blackjack Forum Poker Tournaments  
This article discusses the costs of error in true count conversion for unbalanced blackjack card counting systems.
Arnold Snyder's Blackjack Forum Online Home Arnold Snyder Contact Information About Arnold Snyder's Blackjack Forum Online How to Win at Blackjack Arnold Snyder's Blackjack Forum, Trade Journal for Professional Gamblers Since 1981, New Issue Blackjack and Gambling Forums Moderated by Professional Gamblers Best blackjack card counting system from the Blackjack Forum Gambling Library Best Internet Casinos and Smart Online Gaming Gambling Books Recommended by Professional Gamblers Links to Gambling Sites Recommended by Professional Gamblers  

Six Deck Unbalanced Red 7 Running Count Conversion to Equivalent Hi-Lo Balanced True Count

unbalanced card counting system versus Hi-Lo and errors in true count conversion
Card Counting Reality 42.08%
    By James Grosjean and Previn
Blackjack Strategy Scavenger Blackjack
    By James Grosjean and Previn
Why Card Counting Works Beyond Coupons
    By James Grosjean and Previn
The Easiest Professional Level Card Counting System Excerpt from Beat the 6-Deck Game
    How to Use Frequency Distributions to
    Determine Your Win Rate and
    By Arnold Snyder
Best Opportunities Right Now for Blackjack Players The Hi-Lo Lite and Rounding Indices:
    Why All Those Index Numbers Card
    Counters Have Been Learning For
    Years Never Really Mattered
    By Arnold Snyder
How Professional Gamblers Win How True is Your True Count?
    By Arnold Snyder w/ Dr. John Gwynn Jr.
Card Counting Reality Can Side-Counting Make You a     Super Counter?
    By Arnold Snyder
Card Counting Reality On the Math Behind the OPP
    By Kim Lee
Blackjack Strategy The "Best" Card Counting System
    By Arnold Snyder
Card Counting Reality The "Best" Card Counting System:
    A Comparison of the Red Seven, KO,
    and Hi-Lo Counts (And How Blackjack
    Systems Are Best Compared)
    By Arnold Snyder
    with computer sims by John Auston
Blackjack Strategy Insure a Good Hand? Part I
    By Marvin L. Master
Card Counting Reality Insure a Good Hand? Part II
    By Peter A. Griffin
Blackjack Strategy Surrender: When It Pays to Say
    By Arnold Snyder
Card Counting Reality Six-Deck Unbalanced Red-7 Running
    Count Conversion to Equivalent Hi-Lo
    Balanced True Count and Sensitivity of
    True Count to Errors in Estimating
    Decks Remaining
    By Conrad Membrino
Blackjack Strategy Algebraic Approximations of Optimum
    Blackjack Strategy (Revised)
    By Arnold Snyder
Card Counting Reality Super Sevens Snafu
    By Arnold Snyder
Blackjack Strategy Man vs. Computer: Does Casino
    Blackjack Differ from Computer-
    Simulated Blackjack?
    By Dr. John M. Gwynn, Jr. and Arnold
Card Counting Reality Ruffled by the Non-Random Shuffle
    By Arnold Snyder
Blackjack Strategy Shoehenge…Probing the Multi-Deck
    By Arnold Snyder
Card Counting Reality Improving Your Insurance Decisions:
    The Victor Insurance Parameter
    By Rich Victor
Blackjack Strategy So You Think You're A Blackjack
    By Arnold Snyder
Card Counting Reality Late Surrender & Blackjack Statistics
    By Arnold Snyder
Blackjack Strategy Bad Player at the Blackjack Table:
    Do Other Players Steal Your Aces?
    By Arnold Snyder
Card Counting Reality The Blackjack Insurance Bet
    By Arnold Snyder

Best Internet casino software review


Six Deck Unbalanced Red 7 Running Count Conversion to Equivalent Hi-Lo Balanced True Count and Sensitivity of True Count to Errors in Estimating Decks Remaining

By Conrad Membrino
(From Blackjack Forum Vol. XVII #4, Winter 1997)
© Blackjack Forum 1997

rc.u = 23456p + (7p/2) - TAp

Red-7 is almost equivalent to hi-lo count + counting all the sevens as (1/2) each.
rc.u = unbalanced running count = 23456+ (7p/2) - TAp
tc.b = balanced true count
n = number of decks
dp = decks played
dr = decks remaining
rc.u(tc.b) = unbalanced running count corresponding to a balance true count of tc.b
rc.hl = hi=lo running count = 23456p - TAp
rc.u = hi-lo + (7p)/2
if hi-lo has a true count of "t" then rc.hl = t*dr and

rc.u = rc.hl + ExpVal(7p)/2 = t*dr + 2*dp = (t+2-2)*dr + 2*dp = (t-2)*dr + 2*n

rc.u = 2*n + (tc.b - 2) * dr

Number of Decks = 6

Red-7 Running Counts Corresponding to Various True Counts for a Six Deck Game

Six Deck Game rc.unbal
rc.unbal = 23456 + (7p/2) - TAp decks played
tc.bal rc.unbal 1 2 3 4 5
0 12 - 2*dr 2 4 6 8 10
1 12 - dr 7 8 9 10 11
2 12 12 12 12 12


3 12 + dr 17 16 15 14 13
4 12 + 2*dr 22 20 18 16 14



Sensitivity of True Count to Errors in Estimating Decks Remaining


Estimation of True Count Using the Red 7:

rc.r7 = red 7 running count n = number of decks
tc = true count dr = decks remaining

rc.r7 = 2*n + (tc - 2) * dr


Number of Decks = 8

Red-7 Running Counts Corresponding to Various
True Counts for an Eight Deck Game

Eight Deck Game rc.r7
rc.r7 = 23456 + (7p/2) - TAp decks played
tc rc.r7 3 4 5 6 7
2 16 16 16 16 16 16
3 16 + dr 21 20 19 18 17
4 16 + 2*dr 26 24 22 20 18


Estimation of true count with the Red 7
in an Eight Deck Game:

  1. Estimate decks remaining
  2. Compare Red 7 running count with 16, 16 + dr, or 16 + 2*dr for true counts of 2, 3, or 4
  3. Use calculated true count with High-Low strategy indices.*

(*Ed. Note: Membrino is suggesting here that you may use this true count method not only to estimate your advantage, but also to alter your strategy with all Hi-Lo strategy indices. This is not the way I have developed the Red 7 in the new Blackbelt, but if you used a Starting Count of 0, then you could use this true count methology with any standard set of Hi-Lo count-per-deck indices. --Arnold Snyder)


Sensitivity of True Count to Errors
in Estimating Decks Remaining:

  1. The closer to the pivot point, the less sensitive the true count is to errors in estimating the decks remaining.
  2. At the pivot point, the true count is independent of the decks remaining
  3. Pivot Point of the Red 7: True Count = 2
  4. Pivot Point of Hi-Lo: True Count = 0
  5. At True Counts ≥ 2:
    (a) Red 7 is closer to its pivot point (tc=2) than the Hi-Lo is to its pivot point (tc=0)
    (b) Red 7 is less sensitive to errors in estimating decks remaining when calculating true count.
    (c) Red 7 gives more accurate true counts than Hi-Lo.


A = Actual E = Estimated
dr:a = actual dr dr:e = estimated dr
tc:a = actual tc tc:e = estimated tc

Eight Decks

r7 = red 7 hl = hi-lo
tc.r7 = 2 + (rc.r7 - 16)/dr tc.hl = rc.hl/dr

Eight Decks
dr:a = 4 and tc:a = 3

    Red 7     Hi-Lo  
    estimated error   estimated error
dr:e rc.r7


(tc:e - tc:a) rc.hl tc:e (tc:e - tc:a)
6 20 2.7 -0.3 12 2.0 -1.0
5   2.8 -0.2   2.4 -0.6
4   3.0 0.0   3.0 0.0
3   3.3 0.3   4.0 1.0
2   4.0 1.0   6.0 3.0

Return to Blackjack Forum Professional Gambling Library

Return to Blackjack Forum Online Home

© 2004-2005 Blackjack Forum Online, All Rights Reserved
  Converting a Running Count from an Unbalanced Blackjack Card Counting System to the Equivalent of a True Count
Converting a running count from an unbalanced blackjack card counting system to the equivalent of a balanced card counting system's true count can improve your bet sizing. But in this Blackjack Forum article, Conrad Membrino shows it may not improve the betting accuracy from your card counting very much. Membrino shows the huge effect of inaccuracy in deck estimation in blackjack card counting, and advocates using the simplest unbalanced blackjack card counting systems as is for improved accuracy.